The most photographed subjects showing nice examples of bokeh are portraits. Close-up and macro images of flowers and other objects in nature are also popular subjects to photograph that shows off bokeh in the image. When purposely photographed out-of-focus, these normally harsh or bright objects become soft, pastel, diffused orbs of glowing light.īokeh can add softness to an otherwise brightly lit photograph.Īn often-photographed subject that is an extreme example of bokeh is photographing a grouping of holiday lights or other highly reflective objects. I have tried the DNG route when forced to do so to correct images taken with the Sony NEX 6 it adds time and effort to the workflow and also requires more disk space (at least if one is not willing to delete the original RAW files).Using this technique to separate your subject from the background can also allow you to utilize a not-so-photogenic background in your image-but because of its diffused blur, it helps to “highlight” the subject, not detract from it. Whatever software I have tried, I was faced with a steep learning curve that didn't exactly encourage me to spend time I could use more productively actually processing images with acr/photoshop, a combination I seem to at least have a somewhat decent handle on using. I will likely maintain a subscription to DxO Optics Pro as I plan to make more use of it's features in favor of abandoning LR completely (which I had mostly used to "batch process" images). Photoshop also seems to be the only software that lets me process data in ON1, Topaz, and Nik Collection without the need of yet another saved intermediary.Įven though I still don't like the subscription model one bit (in particular the "pay in perpetuity" part) I grudgingly subscribed (especially after being prompted by my wife's refusal to give up photoshop after she had just gotten accustomed to working with it). The "import process" takes endlessly (import 7000 images from a vacation trip and be prepared to wait all day) and i don't like the proprietary "catalog" concept one bit (unfortunately DxO Optics and Capture One have it too but at least I can save processing parameters outside of them).ĪCR/photoshop seems to be the only combination that transfers images "seamlessly" without the need of an intermediate file that in the end either eats up storage space or needs to be removed manually. I had big hopes for LR (started with 4, upgraded to 5 and eventually 6, the perpetual license version) but I just can't warm up to the software. On1 RAW is fairly new and I stopped the evaluation when I realized how many things were missing I will pick this up soon after several updates have been made and a major one in the forecast. I purchased Capture One (for Sony) but have only very recently begun to use it to produce the files from my A7/A7II it's not clear to me yet that there is an advantage over using ACR despite what I read on the interwebs (I have V9 and have no plans to upgrade to the already available 10). DxO Optics Pro is the one software I already own for some time I don't use it routinely but it would have been top candidate had I actually abandoned acr/photoshop. Haven't warmed up to NX-D, mostly for lack of actually trying. At the time and on my computer, NX2 was always painfully slow and unstable it's now obsolete anyway unless you are willing to deal with the complications in a workflow that uses outdated software. I purchased the standalone version of LR, I dabbled in Capture NX2 and NX-D, DxO Optics Pro, Capture One (for Sony), and lately ON1 RAW (purchased the last three). Ever since adobe came up with the subscription model have I been evaluating other software with regard to replacing acr/photoshop (which I've been using for about a decade now).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |